hexify implements the ISEA (Icosahedral Snyder Equal Area) discrete global grid system. This vignette explains the mathematical foundations: the projection geometry, coordinate systems, aperture subdivision, and cell indexing.
Any projection from a sphere to a plane must distort something. For spatial statistics, we need cells of equal area regardless of location. Standard latitude-longitude grids fail badly: a 1° cell at the equator covers ~12,300 km², while the same cell near the poles covers a tiny fraction of that.
The ISEA projection solves this by:
The foundation of Snyder’s projection is Lambert’s azimuthal equal-area projection, developed by Johann Heinrich Lambert in 1772. The projection maps a sphere of radius \(R\) to a tangent plane while preserving area exactly (Snyder, 1987, p. 182).
The Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection is defined by a mathematical constraint, not a geometric construction. For a projection centered at point \(S\):
These two constraints uniquely determine the radial distance formula. For a point \(P\) at angular distance \(c\) from the center (measured along the sphere surface), the projected distance from the origin is:
\[\rho = 2R \sin\left(\frac{c}{2}\right)\]
This is not a perspective projection and has no simple geometric interpretation like “chord distance” or “ray intersection.” The formula is derived analytically from the equal-area constraint (Snyder, 1987, p. 182-185).
For the oblique aspect centered at \((\lambda_0, \phi_1)\), the full formulas are (Snyder, 1987, eq. 24-2 to 24-4, p. 185):
\[k' = \sqrt{\frac{2}{1 + \sin\phi_1\sin\phi + \cos\phi_1\cos\phi\cos(\lambda - \lambda_0)}}\]
\[x = R \cdot k' \cdot \cos\phi \cdot \sin(\lambda - \lambda_0)\]
\[y = R \cdot k' \cdot [\cos\phi_1\sin\phi - \sin\phi_1\cos\phi\cos(\lambda - \lambda_0)]\]
The projection preserves area because the radial and tangential scale factors satisfy \(h' \cdot k' = 1\) at every point. At angular distance \(c\) from center (Snyder, 1987, eq. 24-22, 24-23, p. 188):
\[h' = \cos\left(\frac{c}{2}\right), \quad k' = \sec\left(\frac{c}{2}\right)\]
Therefore \(h' \cdot k' = \cos(c/2) \cdot \sec(c/2) = 1\), confirming the equal-area property.
Each colored band has equal area on the sphere. After Lambert projection, shapes change (outer bands stretch radially, compress tangentially) but areas remain equal.
The inverse mapping \((x, y) \to (\lambda, \phi)\) recovers geographic coordinates from planar coordinates (Snyder, 1987, eq. 24-14 to 24-16, p. 187):
\[\rho = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}\]
\[c = 2\arcsin\left(\frac{\rho}{2R}\right)\]
where \(c\) is the angular distance from the projection center. Then:
\[\phi = \arcsin\left[\cos c \cdot \sin\phi_1 + \frac{y \cdot \sin c \cdot \cos\phi_1}{\rho}\right]\]
\[\lambda = \lambda_0 + \arctan\left[\frac{x \cdot \sin c}{\rho\cos\phi_1\cos c - y\sin\phi_1\sin c}\right]\]
If \(\rho = 0\), the point is at the projection center: \(\phi = \phi_1\), \(\lambda = \lambda_0\).
Antipode singularity: The point diametrically opposite the projection center (angular distance 180°) maps to infinity and must be excluded from the domain.
Shape distortion: While area is preserved exactly, shapes distort increasingly with distance from center. The maximum angular distortion \(\omega\) at distance \(c\) is (Snyder, 1987, eq. 24-24, p. 188):
\[\sin\left(\frac{\omega}{2}\right) = \frac{k'^2 - 1}{k'^2 + 1}\]
At \(c = 90°\), distortion reaches \(\omega \approx 70.5°\). ISEA grids limit this by using icosahedral faces subtending only ~72° from face center.
No conformality: No projection can be both equal-area and conformal (angle-preserving)—a fundamental constraint from differential geometry (Snyder, 1987, p. 16-18).
Lambert’s projection works for a single tangent plane covering at most a hemisphere. To cover the entire globe with minimal distortion, Snyder used 20 tangent planes—one for each face of a regular icosahedron (Snyder, 1992, p. 10).
A regular icosahedron has:
The 12 vertices are located at (Coxeter, 1973, p. 52-53):
| Location | Latitude | Longitudes |
|---|---|---|
| North pole | +90° | 0° |
| Upper ring | \(+\arctan(1/2) \approx +26.565°\) | 0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, 288° |
| Lower ring | \(-\arctan(1/2) \approx -26.565°\) | 36°, 108°, 180°, 252°, 324° |
| South pole | −90° | 0° |
The latitude \(\arctan(1/2)\) arises from the golden ratio geometry. An icosahedron can be constructed from three mutually perpendicular golden rectangles (\(1 \times \varphi\), where \(\varphi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2\)). The non-polar vertices have \(z\)-coordinate \(1/s\) where \(s = \sqrt{1 + \varphi^2}\), yielding \(\tan\phi = 1/2\).
The default orientation places vertex 0 at longitude 11.25°, latitude 58.28252559°, with azimuth 0°. This places icosahedron vertices (pentagon cells) predominantly over oceans (Sahr et al., 2003, p. 123).
#> Warning in st_point_on_surface.sfc(sf::st_zm(x)): st_point_on_surface may not
#> give correct results for longitude/latitude data
Snyder extended the Lambert projection to the icosahedron by introducing an azimuth-adjustment transformation that ensures seamless transitions between adjacent faces while maintaining the equal-area property (Snyder, 1992, p. 12).
| Constant | Symbol | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edge-to-center angle | \(E_l\) | 37.37736814° | Snyder (1992, Table 1, p. 14) |
| Geometric angle | \(G\) | 36° | 360°/10 (icosahedral 5-fold symmetry) |
| Scale factor | \(R_1\) | 0.9103832815 | Snyder (1992, Table 1, p. 14) |
The complete algorithm comprises seven steps (Snyder, 1992, p. 13-15):
Step 1: Compute angular distance and azimuth from face center \((\lambda_0, \phi_0)\) to point \((\lambda, \phi)\):
\[z = \arccos(\sin\phi_0 \sin\phi + \cos\phi_0 \cos\phi \cos(\lambda - \lambda_0))\] \[\text{Az} = \arctan2(\cos\phi \sin(\lambda - \lambda_0), \cos\phi_0 \sin\phi - \sin\phi_0 \cos\phi \cos(\lambda - \lambda_0))\]
Step 2: Reduce azimuth to [0°, 120°) by exploiting 3-fold symmetry.
Step 3: Compute auxiliary angle \(\delta_z\) (Snyder, 1992, eq. 8, p. 14): \[\delta_z = \arctan\left(\frac{\tan E_l}{\cos \text{Az} + \cot 30° \cdot \sin \text{Az}}\right)\]
Step 4: Compute auxiliary angle \(h\) (Snyder, 1992, eq. 9, p. 14): \[h = \arccos(\sin \text{Az} \sin G \cos E_l - \cos \text{Az} \cos G)\]
Step 5: Compute adjusted azimuth \(\text{Az}'\) (Snyder, 1992, eq. 10-11, p. 14): \[A_G = \text{Az} + G + h - \pi\] \[\text{Az}' = \arctan\left(\frac{2 A_G}{R_1^2 \tan^2 E_l - 2 A_G \cot 30°}\right)\]
Step 6: Compute radial distance (Snyder, 1992, eq. 12-13, p. 14-15): \[f = \frac{\tan E_l}{2(\cos \text{Az}' + \cot 30° \cdot \sin \text{Az}') \sin(\delta_z / 2)}\] \[\rho = 2 R_1 f \sin(z / 2)\]
Step 7: Convert to Cartesian with sector offset restored.
The inverse projection cannot be solved analytically because the azimuth adjustment contains transcendental functions. A Newton-Raphson iteration finds the spherical azimuth Az from the planar azimuth Az’:
\[f(\text{Az}) = \text{agh} - \text{Az} - G + (\pi - h) = 0\]
where \(h = \arccos(\sin \text{Az} \sin G \cos E_l - \cos \text{Az} \cos G)\).
The iteration exhibits quadratic convergence, typically reaching machine precision in 3-5 iterations. hexify provides four precision modes:
| Mode | Tolerance | Typical Iterations | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| fast | \(10^{-10}\) | 3-4 | Interactive visualization |
| default | \(10^{-12}\) | 4-5 | General applications (~1 m accuracy) |
| high | \(10^{-14}\) | 5-6 | High-precision geodesy |
| ultra | \(10^{-15}\) | 6-7 | Research |
Aperture defines how cells subdivide at each resolution level—it’s the ratio of parent cell area to child cell area (Sahr et al., 2003, p. 124).
| Aperture | Area Ratio | Linear Scale | Rotation per Level | Orientation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1:3 | \(\sqrt{3} \approx 1.73\) | 30° | Alternates Class I/II |
| 4 | 1:4 | \(2.0\) | 0° | Always Class I |
| 7 | 1:7 | \(\sqrt{7} \approx 2.65\) | \(\arctan(\sqrt{3/7}) \approx 19.1°\) | Class III |
The aperture 7 rotation angle \(\arctan(\sqrt{3/7})\) arises from the geometric constraint that 7 hexagons in a rosette pattern (1 center + 6 ring) must maintain lattice consistency (DGGRID Manual, 2023).
cat("Resolution Aperture 3 Aperture 4 Aperture 7\n")
#> Resolution Aperture 3 Aperture 4 Aperture 7
cat("--------- ---------- ---------- ----------\n")
#> --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
for (res in 0:8) {
cells_ap3 <- 10 * 3^res + 2
cells_ap4 <- 10 * 4^res + 2
cells_ap7 <- 10 * 7^res + 2
cat(sprintf(" %d %10s %10s %10s\n",
res,
format(cells_ap3, big.mark = ","),
format(cells_ap4, big.mark = ","),
format(cells_ap7, big.mark = ",")))
}
#> 0 12 12 12
#> 1 32 42 72
#> 2 92 162 492
#> 3 272 642 3,432
#> 4 812 2,562 24,012
#> 5 2,432 10,242 168,072
#> 6 7,292 40,962 1,176,492
#> 7 21,872 163,842 8,235,432
#> 8 65,612 655,362 57,648,012For aperture 3, orientation alternates between Class I (flat-top) and Class II (pointy-top) at each resolution. For aperture 7, each level adds a rotation of \(\arctan(\sqrt{3/7}) \approx 19.1°\) (Sahr, 2008, p. 176).
Exactly 12 cells are pentagons at every resolution. This is a topological necessity derived from Euler’s formula (Coxeter, 1973, p. 10):
\[V - E + F = 2\]
For a tiling with \(h\) hexagons and \(p\) pentagons on a sphere: - \(V = (6h + 5p)/3\), \(E = (6h + 5p)/2\), \(F = h + p\)
Substituting into Euler’s formula and simplifying yields \(p = 12\), independent of \(h\).
| Location | Latitude | Longitudes |
|---|---|---|
| Poles | ±90° | 0° |
| Upper ring | \(\arctan(1/2) \approx 26.57°\) | 0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, 288° |
| Lower ring | \(-\arctan(1/2) \approx -26.57°\) | 36°, 108°, 180°, 252°, 324° |
Pentagon area is exactly 5/6 of hexagonal cell area at the same resolution (Sahr et al., 2003, p. 125).
hexify uses a multi-stage coordinate pipeline (Sahr, 2008, p. 178):
| System | Components | Description |
|---|---|---|
| GEO | lon, lat | WGS84 degrees |
| Icosa Triangle | face (0-19), tx, ty | Snyder projection output |
| Quad XY | quad (0-11), qx, qy | Paired-triangle coordinates |
| Quad IJ | quad (0-11), i, j | Quantized grid indices |
| Index | string | Hierarchical cell address (Z3, Z7, or Z-order) |
| SEQNUM | integer | Global cell ID (1-based) |
The 20 triangular faces are paired into 12 “quads” (diamond-shaped regions). Each quad contains two adjacent triangular faces sharing an edge. This pairing transforms 20 triangles into 10 diamond-shaped quads plus 2 polar quads, simplifying grid indexing because a diamond admits a rectangular \((i, j)\) lattice (DGGRID Manual, 2023).
After Snyder projection maps a point onto a triangular face, the continuous \((x, y)\) coordinates are quantized to integer \((i, j)\) indices on the hexagonal lattice. At resolution \(r\) with aperture \(a\), the lattice dimension along each axis is:
\[d = \left\lfloor a^{r/2} \right\rfloor\]
The \((i, j)\) pair uniquely identifies a cell within a quad. Combined with the quad number (0–11), this gives a globally unique cell address.
hexify supports three hierarchical index encodings. Each converts the \((quad, i, j)\) triple into a compact string or integer that encodes the cell’s position in the subdivision hierarchy.
The Z7 index represents each cell as a hierarchical path through the aperture-7 subdivision tree (Sahr, 2025). The format is:
\[\texttt{BB}\underbrace{\texttt{D}_1\texttt{D}_2\cdots\texttt{D}_r}_{r \text{ digits}}\]
where BB is the base cell (00–11) and each digit \(D_k \in \{0, 1, \ldots, 6\}\) selects one of 7 children at level \(k\). The digit meanings correspond to positions in the IVec3D cube coordinate system:
| Digit | Direction | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | CENTER | Center child (same position as parent) |
| 1 | K_AXES | K-axis direction |
| 2 | J_AXES | J-axis direction |
| 3 | JK_AXES | JK-axis direction |
| 4 | I_AXES | I-axis direction |
| 5 | IK_AXES | IK-axis direction |
| 6 | IJ_AXES | IJ-axis direction |
Pentagon cells (at icosahedron vertices) have only 5 children instead of 7. Base cells 0–5 skip digit 2 (J_AXES); cells 6–11 skip digit 5 (IK_AXES).
# Z7 index encoding for aperture 7
g7 <- hex_grid(resolution = 4, aperture = 7)
cell <- lonlat_to_cell(16.37, 48.21, g7)
idx <- cell_to_index(cell, g7)
cat(sprintf("Cell %d -> Z7 index: %s\n", cell, idx))
#> Cell 18521 -> Z7 index: 005652
cat(sprintf(" Base cell: %s, Digits: %s\n",
substr(idx, 1, 2), substr(idx, 3, nchar(idx))))
#> Base cell: 00, Digits: 5652
# Hierarchical property: parent is obtained by dropping the last digit
parent_idx <- substr(idx, 1, nchar(idx) - 1)
parent_info <- hexify_index_to_cell(parent_idx, 7, "z7")
cat(sprintf(" Parent index: %s (face %d, i=%d, j=%d)\n",
parent_idx, parent_info$face,
as.integer(parent_info$i), as.integer(parent_info$j)))
#> Parent index: 00565 (face 1, i=15, j=40)The Z3 index encodes the aperture-3 subdivision hierarchy using digit pairs (Sahr, 2008). Because aperture 3 alternates between Class I and Class II orientation at each level, the encoding uses two digits per resolution-level pair:
\[\texttt{BB}\underbrace{\texttt{D}_1\texttt{D}_2\texttt{D}_3\texttt{D}_4\cdots}_{2\lceil r/2 \rceil \text{ digits}}\]
Each \((i_d, j_d)\) digit pair is mapped through a lookup table to a Z3 code pair. For example, the offset \((1, 0)\) maps to digits “01”, while \((0, 1)\) maps to “22”. This mapping preserves the space-filling curve property, ensuring hierarchical locality.
# Z3 index encoding for aperture 3
g3 <- hex_grid(resolution = 8, aperture = 3)
cell <- lonlat_to_cell(16.37, 48.21, g3)
idx <- cell_to_index(cell, g3)
cat(sprintf("Cell %d -> Z3 index: %s\n", cell, idx))
#> Cell 14092 -> Z3 index: 0321202211
cat(sprintf(" Base cell: %s, Digits: %s (%d digit pairs)\n",
substr(idx, 1, 2), substr(idx, 3, nchar(idx)),
(nchar(idx) - 2) / 2))
#> Base cell: 03, Digits: 21202211 (4 digit pairs)The Z-order (Morton) index uses bit-interleaving of the \((i, j)\) coordinates, producing a Morton space-filling curve (Morton, 1966). The encoding depends on the aperture:
| Property | Z7 | Z3 | Z-order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apertures | 7 only | 3 only | 3, 4, 7 |
| Digits per level | 1 (range 0–6) | 2 (pairs) | 1 (ap3/4) or 2 (ap7) |
| Encoding | Hierarchical path | Mapping table | Bit interleaving |
| Locality | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Parent operation | Drop last digit | Drop last pair | Drop last digit(s) |
| Index length (res \(r\)) | \(2 + r\) | \(2 + 2\lceil r/2\rceil\) | \(2 + r\) or \(2 + 2r\) |
All three encodings are bijective: each \((quad, i, j)\) triple maps to exactly one index string, and vice versa. hexify stores indices as character strings to support arbitrary precision and avoid integer overflow at high resolutions.
The SEQNUM provides a unique integer for each cell, independent of the hierarchical index. The total cell count at resolution \(r\) with aperture \(a\) is:
\[N(r) = 10 \times a^r + 2\]
The “+2” accounts for the two polar pentagon cells. SEQNUMs are assigned by traversing quads in order (0–11) and cells within each quad in row-major \((i, j)\) order. This numbering maintains compatibility with dggridR.
For database-friendly storage, hexify can pack any hierarchical index into a single 64-bit unsigned integer:
\[\texttt{uint64} = (\texttt{face} \ll 60) \;|\; \texttt{packed\_digits}\]
The top 4 bits encode the face (0–11), and the remaining 60 bits pack the index digits. This supports resolutions up to \(\lfloor 60 / \lceil\log_2 a\rceil \rfloor\) before overflow.
hexify supports Uber’s H3 system as a first-class alternative to the ISEA backend. H3 uses a fundamentally different design with important trade-offs.
| Property | ISEA (hexify native) | H3 (Uber) |
|---|---|---|
| Projection | Snyder ISEA (equal-area) | Face-centered gnomonic |
| Polyhedron | Icosahedron (20 faces) | Icosahedron (20 faces) |
| Aperture | 3, 4, 7, or mixed 4/3 | 7 (fixed) |
| Cell area | Exactly equal | Varies by location |
| Resolutions | 0–30 | 0–15 |
| Cell IDs | Integer SEQNUM | 64-bit hex string |
| Pentagon handling | 12 per resolution | 12 per resolution |
Both systems tile the sphere with hexagons on an icosahedral framework, but the projection and subdivision choices lead to different properties.
The most significant difference is area uniformity. ISEA uses the Snyder equal-area projection, guaranteeing that all hexagonal cells at a given resolution have identical area (pentagons are 5/6 of hex area). H3 uses a gnomonic (central) projection per face, which is not equal-area. This causes cell areas to vary by latitude:
# Compare ISEA (constant area) vs H3 (variable area) at similar resolutions
lats <- seq(-85, 85, by = 5)
lons <- rep(10, length(lats))
# ISEA: aperture 7, resolution 6 (~130 km² cells)
g_isea <- hex_grid(resolution = 6, aperture = 7)
isea_cells <- lonlat_to_cell(lons, lats, g_isea)
isea_areas <- cell_area(isea_cells, g_isea)
# H3: resolution 4 (~1,770 km² cells — different scale, but shows the pattern)
g_h3 <- hex_grid(resolution = 4, type = "h3")
h3_cells <- lonlat_to_cell(lons, lats, g_h3)
h3_areas <- cell_area(h3_cells, g_h3)
# Normalize to show relative variation
isea_rel <- isea_areas / mean(isea_areas)
h3_rel <- h3_areas / mean(h3_areas)
par(mar = c(4, 4, 2, 1), bg = "white")
plot(lats, h3_rel, type = "l", col = "#E63946", lwd = 2.5,
xlab = "Latitude (degrees)", ylab = "Relative cell area",
main = "Cell Area Variation by Latitude",
ylim = range(c(isea_rel, h3_rel)))
lines(lats, isea_rel, col = "#457B9D", lwd = 2.5)
abline(h = 1, lty = 2, col = "gray50")
legend("topright", legend = c("H3 (gnomonic)", "ISEA (equal-area)"),
col = c("#E63946", "#457B9D"), lwd = 2.5, bty = "n")For ecological and statistical applications where equal-area cells are important (species density estimation, spatial sampling), ISEA is the correct choice. For applications where hierarchical indexing speed matters more than area equality (ride-sharing, logistics), H3 may be preferable.
Because ISEA supports multiple apertures, there is no one-to-one
resolution mapping to H3. The h3_crosswalk() function finds
the closest H3 resolution for a given ISEA grid:
# H3 resolution table: compare H3 and ISEA aperture-7 cell areas
cat("H3 Res Avg Area (km²) ISEA Ap7 Equivalent\n")
#> H3 Res Avg Area (km²) ISEA Ap7 Equivalent
cat("------ -------------- -------------------\n")
#> ------ -------------- -------------------
for (h3_res in 0:8) {
g_h3 <- hex_grid(resolution = h3_res, type = "h3")
h3_area <- g_h3@area_km2
# Find closest ISEA ap7 resolution by brute force
best_res <- 0
best_diff <- Inf
for (r in 0:15) {
g_test <- hex_grid(resolution = r, aperture = 7)
d <- abs(log(g_test@area_km2) - log(h3_area))
if (d < best_diff) { best_diff <- d; best_res <- r }
}
g_isea <- hex_grid(resolution = best_res, aperture = 7)
cat(sprintf(" %2d %14.1f res %d (%.1f km²)\n",
h3_res, h3_area, best_res, g_isea@area_km2))
}
#> 0 4357449.4 res 1 (7084244.7 km²)
#> 1 609788.4 res 2 (1036718.7 km²)
#> 2 86801.8 res 3 (148620.5 km²)
#> 3 12393.4 res 4 (21242.1 km²)
#> 4 1770.3 res 5 (3034.8 km²)
#> 5 252.9 res 6 (433.5 km²)
#> 6 36.1 res 7 (61.9 km²)
#> 7 5.2 res 8 (8.8 km²)
#> 8 0.7 res 9 (1.3 km²)| Use case | Recommended | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Species distribution modeling | ISEA | Equal area eliminates sampling bias |
| Spatial statistics (Moran’s I, variograms) | ISEA | Equal area ensures unbiased estimates |
| Ride-sharing / logistics | H3 | Fast hierarchical lookups |
| Visualization only | Either | Area variation invisible at map scale |
| Cross-system interoperability | Both via h3_crosswalk() |
Bidirectional mapping |
original_lon <- 16.37
original_lat <- 48.21
cat(sprintf("Original: (%.4f, %.4f)\n\n", original_lon, original_lat))
#> Original: (16.3700, 48.2100)
for (ap in c(3, 4, 7)) {
res <- if (ap == 7) 6 else 10
grid <- hex_grid(resolution = res, aperture = ap)
cell_id <- lonlat_to_cell(original_lon, original_lat, grid)
recovered <- cell_to_lonlat(cell_id, grid)
error_km <- sqrt((recovered$lon - original_lon)^2 +
(recovered$lat - original_lat)^2) * 111
cat(sprintf("Aperture %d (res %2d): cell %d -> (%.4f, %.4f), ~%.1f km from center\n",
ap, res, cell_id,
recovered$lon, recovered$lat, error_km))
}
#> Aperture 3 (res 10): cell 126594 -> (16.4204, 48.2877), ~10.3 km from center
#> Aperture 4 (res 10): cell 2245587 -> (16.4177, 48.2119), ~5.3 km from center
#> Aperture 7 (res 6): cell 830431 -> (16.3945, 48.2583), ~6.0 km from center| Property | Description |
|---|---|
| Equal area | All hexagonal cells identical; pentagons = 5/6 hex area |
| Bounded distortion | Max angular distortion ~17.3° at face edges |
| Uniform topology | Hexagons have 6 neighbors; pentagons have 5 |
| 12 pentagons | Topological necessity from Euler’s formula |
Brodsky, I. (2018). H3: Uber’s Hexagonal Hierarchical Spatial Index. Uber Engineering Blog. https://eng.uber.com/h3/
Coxeter, H.S.M. (1973). Regular Polytopes (3rd ed.). Dover Publications.
DGGRID Manual (2023). DGGRID Version 7.8 Documentation. https://github.com/sahrk/DGGRID
Morton, G.M. (1966). A Computer Oriented Geodetic Data Base and a New Technique in File Sequencing. IBM Technical Report.
Sahr, K. (2008). Location coding on icosahedral aperture 3 hexagon discrete global grids. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(3), 174-187.
Sahr, K. (2025). IGEO7: An equal-area hierarchical hexagonal discrete global grid system with Z7 indexing. Cartography and Geographic Information Science.
Sahr, K., White, D., & Kimerling, A.J. (2003). Geodesic Discrete Global Grid Systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30(2), 121-134.
Snyder, J.P. (1987). Map Projections: A Working Manual. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1395.
Snyder, J.P. (1992). An equal-area map projection for polyhedral globes. Cartographica, 29(1), 10-21.